Bibliotheca Lituana: Development of Collections of Memory Institutions (Acronym: BLAIR)

Project cost (Litas): 130 000 LTL (for the years 2010-2011).

Project executive team:

  • prof. dr. (HP) Arvydas Pacevičius, Professor of the Institute of Library and Information Science at the Faculty of Communication, Vilnius University, Project Head,
  • Žygintas Bučys, Deputy Director of the Lithuanian National Museum,
  • dr. Ineta Sibrian, Lecturer, Institute of Library and Information Science at the Faculty of Communication, Vilnius University,
  • dr. Rafał Witkowski, Deputy Director of the Faculty of History at Adam Mickiewicz University.
Financing source: The Research Council of Lithuania.

Project aim: The Project aim is to conduct interdisciplinary research on the origin, development, structure, content, and functioning of libraries, archives, and Lituanistic collections of museums (funds, collected sets, document pools) in terms of methodology, theory, history, documentation, and digitization, along with preparation and publication of the sources.


Project brief description: The Project Bibliotheca Lituana: Development of Collections of Memory Institutions is intended for integrated and interdisciplinary research of Lituanistic collections held by memory institutions (archives, libraries and museums), with subsequent publication of the research results. The Project is chiefly aimed at ensuring historiographic continuity of the research body, extending its breadth by new conceptual studies into methodology, collection development and documentation, all of which will bridge fundamental and applied sciences.

Project objectives: to prepare and publish fundamental Lituanistic sources stored at libraries and other memory institutions; to prepare and publish the serial publication Bibliotheca Lituana (I), envisioned by Juozas Slapšinskas-Rimantas during the mid-war period in Lithuania; to prepare and publish Bibliotheca Lituana (I), a critical collection of sources and scientific papers; to publish Dovanų Vilniaus universiteto bibliotekai knyga, 1796-1832 [The Book of Gifts for the Vilnius University Library, 1796-1832], together with the study Pamirštoji mecenatystė [The Forgotten Patronage].

The Project will entail the following activities: research in the areas of library science and museology on the shift of paradigms and philosophical aspects of preservation of the collections both within the conventional and virtual space and time; research on the description, cataloguing, and development of the collections and on the inventory of museums, archives, libraries‘ catalogues, and book descriptions; a methodology for their publication and description has already been prepared; typical and unique catalogues and book lists of the old libraries (from manor houses, churches and convents/monasteries) are already in press. An international team of scientists has been formed for the Project implementation.

Lithuanian Egodocumental Heritage (Acronym: LEGODOK)

Project cost (Litas): 599 900 LTL (for the years 2010-2013).

Project executive team:

  • prof. dr. (HP) Arvydas Pacevičius, Professor of the Institute of Library and Information Science at the Faculty of Communication, Vilnius University, Project Head, 
  • prof., Habil. Dr. Waldemar Chorążyczewski, Deputy Director of the Institute of History and Archival Science at Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń,
  • prof. dr. Šarūnas Liekis, Professor of the Department of Political Science at Mykolas Romeris University,
  • assoc. Prof., Dr. Julija Zinkevičienė, Associate Professor of the Institute of Book Science and Documentation at the Faculty of Communication, Vilnius University.

Financing source: The Research Council of Lithuania.

Project aim: The Project’s strategic aim is to provide the European and global access to the egodocumental (ED) heritage in the virtual space, following the inventorying of the Lithuanian egodocumental heritage, i.e. writing in the 1st person (memoirs, diaries, letters, autobiographical accounts), and after the completion of the research on systematics and typology based on historical genetics.
 
Project brief description: The ED heritage makes only a part of documental heritage, among which the area of subject-matter autobiographical writing has emerged lately. In Lithuania, there is a lack of consistent research studies that consider the ED heritage as an integrated corpus. The methodological basis for scientific research into the subject will be the ED concept coined by J. Presser, along with the insights of the researchers exploring the Western European autobiographical writing (W. Schulze, S. Roszak and others) as well as the new research trends (R. Mordenti in Italy, F. J. Ruggiu and S. Mouysset in France, K. von Greyerz in Switzerland, C. Ulbricht in Germany).

The research will make use of the methods for systemic and content analysis of documents, also the methods of bibliography, comparative history and archive science, paleography, statistical analysis, and others. These techniques will help disclose and describe the ED heritage as an integrated corpus and a unique phenomenon in the context of culture and social life of an analysed epoch. Also, ED origin (provenance), issues on cultural patterns in the clerical activity, writing practice, regional paleographical peculiarities, ED form and materials (paper, ink), ED provenances and marginalia will make a significant part of the research body. 

Applied research will include retrieval of ED bibliographical information; drafting and publication of ED listings and subject bibliographies; specification of the elements in the archival entries; specification of priorities, criteria, and methodology for digital documentation; designing of the ED heritage website LEGODOK with its content management system; designing the working model of the ED database; and ensuring the interface with the infrastructure for history and heritage of humanities and social sciences. The Project is intended not only for formal recognition and description of egodocuments, but also for the analysis of the ‘I’ (Ego) development in them, thus enabling international (regional) comparison and justification of typology and hierarchy within the European historical-genetic perspective.